alaterdate: head with an interrobang (Surprised)
[personal profile] alaterdate

If you hover your mouse over the star ratings on Goodreads and Audible the 3-star option is "I liked it" and "Pretty good" respectively. But to me 3-stars means "It was okay." It's not a book I would particularly recommend, but also not one I'd dissuade people from reading.
Herein lies the problem. If the websites are marking 3-stars as "good" instead of "okay" then in actuality shouldn't all my 3-star ratings be rated as 2-stars instead? "It was okay" (Goodreads) & "It's okay" (Audible).
Then all my 2-stars would drop to 1-star! But 2-stars is just an abysmal rating. A 2-star book is one that I would mention how I found it lacking if someone brought it up. And I save the 1-star rating for things I actually didn't like and would want to dissuade someone from reading. I don't really use star ratings in the contents of my own reviews/logs or on my website. I have a loose tag here I've been considering removing in favor of just tagging them with genres, but I do mark them on the website. So should I follow their metrics when rating books on their site?? It seems much harsher than my actual opinion.

Date: 2025-01-30 02:18 am (UTC)
pauraque: bird flying (Default)
From: [personal profile] pauraque
See, this is exactly why I don't use star ratings. I would just get tied up in wondering if my use of them was accurately calibrated to other people's.

But FWIW, 3 stars being a "pretty good" makes no sense to me either. It's the midpoint of the scale, so it should be the most neutral rating. I find it hard to believe that most people are really giving two stars to books they thought were "OK".

April 2025

S M T W T F S
  12345
6789101112
13141516171819
2021222324 2526
27282930   

Page Summary

Custom Text

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Feb. 25th, 2026 12:05 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios